Grounding
The connection between language and reality—how agents anchor their outputs in facts, evidence, and the external world rather than pure pattern completion.
Grounding refers to the mechanisms that connect agent outputs to external reality—anchoring language in facts, evidence, observations, and verified information rather than relying solely on patterns learned during training.
The Problem of Ungrounded Language
Language models are trained to predict text. They learn patterns—what words follow other words—not facts about the world. This creates a fundamental problem:
graph TD A[THE WORLD<br/>facts, events, state] -->|?| B[LANGUAGE MODEL<br/>patterns from training data<br/><br/>- Training data may be outdated<br/>- Training data may be incomplete<br/>- Training data may be wrong<br/>- Model may interpolate incorrectly] B --> C[Output may not<br/>match reality] style A fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:2px,color:#cccccc style B fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:2px,color:#cccccc style C fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:1px,color:#cccccc
Without grounding, agents can only access the world through the distorted lens of training data—fixed at a point in time, incomplete, and potentially erroneous.
Types of Grounding
Retrieval Grounding
Connecting to external knowledge sources:
- Document retrieval
- Web search
- Database queries
- Knowledge graphs
The agent retrieves relevant information and incorporates it into context before generating.
Perceptual Grounding
Connecting to direct observations:
- Tool outputs
- API responses
- Sensor data
- File system state
The agent perceives current reality rather than relying on training knowledge.
Verification Grounding
Checking outputs against sources:
- Citation verification
- Fact-checking
- Consistency checking
- Source attribution
The agent validates its claims rather than asserting them without evidence.
Temporal Grounding
Connecting to current time:
- Real-time data
- Recent events
- Current state
The agent knows “now” and can access up-to-date information.
graph TD Q[Query] --> S[Search] Q --> T[Tools] Q --> D[Databases] S --> E[Retrieved Evidence<br/>EXTERNAL SOURCES<br/>Reality] T --> E D --> E E --> M[Model generates<br/>grounded response] style Q fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:2px,color:#cccccc style S fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:1px,color:#cccccc style T fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:1px,color:#cccccc style D fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:1px,color:#cccccc style E fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:2px,color:#cccccc style M fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:2px,color:#cccccc
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
The dominant grounding paradigm today is RAG:
- Query: User asks a question or agent needs information
- Retrieve: Search relevant documents from a knowledge base
- Augment: Add retrieved content to model context
- Generate: Model produces response incorporating retrieved information
User: "What is the current stock price of Apple?"
Without RAG: "Apple stock is around $150..." (possibly outdated)
With RAG:
- Retrieve: [Fetch current AAPL price: $187.32]
- Generate: "Apple (AAPL) is currently trading at $187.32."
Tool Use as Grounding
Beyond retrieval, agents can ground through action:
| Tool | Grounding Function |
|---|---|
| Web search | Current information from the web |
| Calculator | Mathematical truth |
| Code execution | Verified computation |
| File system | Actual file contents |
| APIs | Real-world service state |
| Databases | Authoritative records |
Each tool call creates a grounding point—an observation that connects reasoning to reality.
The Grounding-Hallucination Tradeoff
Grounding and hallucination exist in tension:
- Maximum grounding: Only assert what’s directly retrieved/observed. Safe but limited.
- Maximum generation: Pure pattern completion. Creative but unreliable.
graph LR A[Direct Quote<br/>Very safe<br/>Limited] --> B[Cited Claim<br/>Useful but<br/>needs care] B --> C[Inferred from<br/>Evidence<br/>Useful but<br/>needs care] C --> D[Pattern<br/>Matched<br/>Dangerous if<br/>presented as fact] D --> E[Fabricated<br/>Content<br/>Dangerous if<br/>presented as fact] PG[Pure Grounding] -.-> A PGen[Pure Generation] -.-> E style A fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:2px,color:#cccccc style B fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:1px,color:#cccccc style C fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:1px,color:#cccccc style D fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:1px,color:#cccccc style E fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#00ff00,stroke-width:1px,color:#cccccc style PG fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#333333,stroke-width:1px,color:#666666 style PGen fill:#0a0a0a,stroke:#333333,stroke-width:1px,color:#666666
The art is in calibrating this tradeoff for different contexts.
Challenges in Grounding
Retrieval Quality
The wrong documents retrieved mean wrong grounding. Garbage in, garbage out.
Context Integration
Models may ignore retrieved context or misweight it against training knowledge.
Source Reliability
Not all sources are equally trustworthy. How should agents evaluate source quality?
Temporal Coherence
Mixing information from different times can create inconsistencies.
Scalability
Comprehensive grounding is expensive—every claim verified, every fact checked.
Adversarial Inputs
Grounding sources (websites, documents) may contain prompt injections or misinformation.
Grounding and Trust
Grounding is fundamentally about trust:
- Training data: Trusted at training time, but fixed and possibly outdated
- Retrieved sources: Must be evaluated for reliability
- Tool outputs: Generally trusted, but tools can fail or be manipulated
- User inputs: May be adversarial
A robust grounding architecture layers trust:
Most trusted: Direct tool observations
Verified sources
Retrieved documents
Training knowledge
Least trusted: User-provided claims
The Anthropological Parallel
Human societies have developed grounding institutions:
| Human Institution | Agent Equivalent |
|---|---|
| Libraries | Document stores |
| Encyclopedias | Knowledge bases |
| Journalism | Web search |
| Scientific method | Verification tools |
| Citation practices | Source attribution |
| Peer review | Consistency checking |
Agents are recapitulating the development of knowledge infrastructure that took humans millennia to build.
Future Directions
Grounding is evolving rapidly:
- Learned retrieval: Models that know what to retrieve
- Multi-hop reasoning: Grounding chains across multiple sources
- Provenance tracking: Following claims back to original sources
- Confidence calibration: Knowing what’s well-grounded vs. uncertain
- Real-time grounding: Continuous connection to current reality
The goal: agents that not only can access truth but know when they have it and when they don’t.
See Also
- Hallucination — what grounding aims to prevent
- Tool Use — grounding through action
- Memory Systems — grounding in past experience